The Predatory Dynamics of Memecoin Sniping: Market Manipulation in the Wild West of Cryptocurrency
Summary
The meme coin market isn’t just a gamble—it’s a battleground where automated sniping bots systematically strip value from unsuspecting investors. Operating in a legal gray zone, these bots exploit speed, insider knowledge, and liquidity manipulation to orchestrate rapid pump-and-dump schemes, leaving retail buyers with worthless assets.
Case studies like $MELANIA and $LIBRA expose how deeply insiders are embedded in these scams, with creators using sniper wallets to extract millions before engineered collapses. As regulators struggle to keep up, the lack of oversight continues to enable this predatory cycle, making clear that without intervention, the playing field will remain anything but fair.
DISCLAIMER: This is an investigative opinion piece and does not provide legal, financial, tax or investment advice. Always do your own due diligence and consult with an experienced professional in your state, region or country.
Understanding Memecoin Sniping
Sniping refers to the use of automated bots to purchase newly launched cryptocurrency tokens within milliseconds of their debut on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). These bots exploit the initial liquidity pool phase, where token prices are highly volatile, to secure large positions before retail investors can react. The goal is to "pump and dump": artificially inflate prices through rapid accumulation, then sell at peak valuation, leaving latecomers with worthless assets.
Snipers rely on three key advantages:
Speed: Bots execute trades faster than humanly possible, often leveraging premium blockchain nodes to front-run transactions.
Insider Knowledge: Creators frequently collaborate with snipers, sharing launch details to coordinate timed buy-ins.
Liquidity Manipulation: By dominating early trading volume, snipers create false demand signals, luring unsuspecting investors.
This practice thrives in the unregulated meme coin ecosystem, where projects like $MELANIA and $LIBRA have demonstrated how easily markets can be rigged against ordinary participants.
The Alarming Prevalence of Sniping
Sniping is endemic to meme coin markets. Analysts estimate that 95% of newly launched tokens are scams, with sniping bots contributing to their rapid inflation and collapse. Platforms like Pump.fun and decentralized exchanges on Solana host thousands of daily launches, many of which are designed solely for sniper exploitation.
Tools of the Trade: Bots like BonkBot, SolTradingBot, and Photon-Sol are widely marketed to traders, offering features such as auto-buy thresholds, slippage controls, and multi-chain sniping.
Insider Collusion: Investigations into projects like $MELANIA and $LIBRA revealed that creators used "team wallets" to snipe their own tokens. For instance, the Solana wallet "0xcEA" netted $2.4 million from $MELANIA and $6 million from $LIBRA by front-running retail buyers.
Scale of Losses: The $LIBRA token alone collapsed by 95% within hours of its launch after insiders withdrew $107 million in liquidity, illustrating the systemic risk posed by sniping.
Legality: A Regulatory Gray Zone
Sniping operates in a legal vacuum. Unlike traditional securities, meme coins often evade scrutiny due to their classification as "utility tokens" or "community-driven assets." However, specific scenarios cross into illegality:
Market Manipulation: Deliberate price inflation through coordinated buying violates anti-fraud statutes in jurisdictions like the U.S. and EU. The $LIBRA case, where creators siphoned $87 million via pre-planned dumps, is under investigation for securities fraud.
Insider Trading: Developers sharing launch details with sniper networks may breach fiduciary duty if the token is deemed a security.
Money Laundering: Cross-chain transfers to obscure fund origins (e.g., Avalanche-to-Solana swaps in $MELANIA) could trigger anti-money laundering (AML) laws.
Despite these risks, enforcement remains inconsistent. High-frequency trading precedents from traditional markets are often cited to justify sniping’s legality, but the lack of centralized oversight in crypto exacerbates harm.
When Sniping Crosses Ethical and Legal Lines
Sniping becomes unequivocally unethical when:
Creators Participate: Projects like $MELANIA and $LIBRA collapsed after their teams siphoned profits via sniper wallets. This constitutes fraud, as developers misrepresented the token’s organic demand.
False Liquidity Locks: Many meme coins advertise "100% burned liquidity" to attract buyers, but audits reveal these claims are falsified to facilitate rug pulls.
Political Exploitation: Endorsements from public figures (e.g., Argentina’s President Javier Milei for $LIBRA) amplify losses when insiders dump holdings.
Legal action is increasingly targeting these practices. The Burwick Law Firm’s lawsuit against Pump.fun alleges the platform enabled "foreseeable harm" by profiting from scam tokens, while Argentine lawmakers are pursuing impeachment proceedings against Milei over $LIBRA’s collapse.
Case Studies: $MELANIA, $LIBRA, and the Sniping Playbook
$MELANIA: Marketed as a tribute to Melania Trump, the token’s creators used wallet "0xcEA" to snipe its launch, extracting $2.4 million before transferring funds to Avalanche. Blockchain analysts at Bubblemaps linked this wallet to subsequent funding of $LIBRA.
$LIBRA: Endorsed by President Milei, the token reached a $4 billion market cap before imploding. Insider wallets, including "0xcEA," dumped $6 million worth of tokens immediately after launch, triggering panic selling.
$TRUMP: While less directly implicated in sniping, the token’s volatility mirrors patterns seen in manipulated markets, raising questions about undisclosed insider activity.
These cases highlight a recurring theme: meme coin launches are frequently orchestrated pump-and-dump schemes, with sniping bots serving as the primary tool for extracting value.
Conclusion: The Urgent Need for Accountability
Sniping epitomizes the predatory underbelly of cryptocurrency innovation. While decentralized finance (DeFi) promises democratized access, the reality is a landscape where insiders with advanced tools exploit informational and technological asymmetries.
I believe regulatory bodies must classify meme coins as securities to enforce transparency, mandate liquidity lock disclosures, and penalize insider sniping. Until then, retail investors remain vulnerable to a system rigged against them.
Mitch Jackson, Esq. | links
Related stories and links:
The $TRUMP and $MELANIA Crypto Scandal: How a Presidential Meme Coin Cost Investors Billions
Argentine lawyers accuse President Milei of fraud over $LIBRA cryptocurrency promotion
Argentina’s memecoin creator interview (LIBRA) via Coffeezilla on YouTube
This post is free.
But free doesn’t build the future.
Independent journalism only works when people like you choose to lean in—not just with attention, but with support.
If this work matters to you, today’s a great day to take the leap.
$5 a month. $50 a year. For you or gift to a friend.
A small investment in something bigger than all of us.
Hi Mitch,
I wanted to take a moment to applaud your efforts to steer the ship and take the helm with such dedication and vision. I'm excited about becoming more engaged with the Substack family and contributing to our shared journey.
As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. so eloquently said, "We may have come over on different ships, but we're all in the same boat now." I truly believe in the power of our collective efforts and look forward to seeing what we can achieve together.
Best regards,
Sherry