BREAKING: National Security, Group Chats, and the Clown Car Administration That Keeps on Giving

This was the national security equivalent of letting the Three Stooges play Battleship with real missiles and a group chat.

So let me get this straight: Trump’s all-star varsity team of national security experts—including Mike Waltz, Pete Hegseth, Marco Rubio, and JD Vance —decided that the best place to plan a sensitive military strike on Yemen was…a Signal group chat. And not just any Signal group chat. No, they accidentally invited a journalist—the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic no less—into the digital war room. And the cherry on top? Nobody noticed until after the strike.

I mean, who needs a mole when you’ve got boomers with fat thumbs and no understanding of basic OPSEC?

Let’s talk law. Because despite the reality show vibe, this isn’t just dumb—it’s criminally dumb. The Espionage Act? Yeah, that thing Trump’s already faced and should have gone down for when he was hoarding documents in his golden toilet room. It covers “unauthorized retention and transmission of national defense information.” And transmitting targeting data, attack sequencing, and intelligence over a consumer-grade messaging app definitely qualifies. Oh, and Pentagon regulations explicitly state apps like Signal are not authorized for DoD information.

So, congratulations, gentlemen. You didn’t just break the rules—you smashed them, set them on fire, and then broadcast the bonfire to a civilian.

Let’s pause here. Because unlike this group of tactical toddlers, I believe we should take national security seriously. Classified systems like SIPRNet and JWICS exist for a reason. They’re air-gapped, encrypted, and staffed by professionals who know the difference between a launch window and a lunch break.

To get this classified material onto Signal, someone had to manually transfer it. You don’t “accidentally” copy top-secret strike plans onto an iPhone unless you’re willfully reckless or breathtakingly stupid. Either way, you’ve violated protocols that, if committed by a junior officer, would result in clearance revocation, job termination, and probably a one-way ticket to Leavenworth.

But here’s the kicker: they’re not being investigated. Why? Because the people responsible for this idiocy are the very same people who’d have to authorize the investigation. That’s like asking a fox to secure the henhouse—after it’s already eaten the chickens and tweeted about it.

And Trump? Mr. “I Don’t Know Anything About It”? Of course not. He’s busy playing golf and pretending The Atlantic doesn’t exist—despite it doing his job better than half his cabinet ever did.

This isn’t just a breach. It’s a flashing neon sign that says: “We’ve replaced serious leadership with performative clowns.” And let’s not ignore the raging hypocrisy. These are the same guys who clutched their pearls over Hillary’s emails like the Republic depended on it. Turns out they don’t mind compromising national security—as long as it’s done with blue bubbles and Signal stickers.

You want to talk about risk to democracy? Forget deep-state conspiracies and phantom voter fraud. The real threat is a government so staggeringly irresponsible it treats classified strike plans like a NCAA tournament bracket trext conversation between college roommates.

This isn’t just incompetence. It’s dereliction. And if there’s any justice left in this system, heads should roll. But let’s be honest: in Trump-world, accountability’s about as rare as a humble tweet.

Mitch Jackson, Esq. | links

---

Related Tuesday morning post: Potential Federal Law Violations from Sharing Classified War Plans via Signal

---

This post is free.

But free doesn’t build the future.

Independent journalism only works when people like you choose to lean in—not just with attention, but with support.

If this work matters to you, today’s a great day to take the leap.

$5 a month. $50 a year.

A small investment in something bigger than all of us.

---